British people were proud of their freedom to speak and write their minds – something worth reflecting on in these days of attempts to silence people in the name of political correctness. And if they used that freedom for frivolous purposes as well as serious ones, that was only to be expected.
Here’s an example of the latter kind of publication, as explained in an advertisement in the Norwich papers in 1787:
Number 1. (To be-continued the first of every month) of The Rovers Magazine; or, the rambles of men of fashion, and women of pleasure. A work wholly devoted to Gaiety, Mirth, Amusement, Love, Gallantry, and the Bon Ton, and Particularly calculated for the perusal of the polite world; as it will exhibit the amours of every class, from the prince to the peasant, from Duchess to the Demireps; and furnish a Manly Banquet of Anecdote, Wit, Humour and Whimsicality which cannot fail to provoke the Laugh, and set the table in a roar; exploring new paths of pleasantry and social bliss; and serving as a new Hobby-Horse; or an agreeable companion in a post-chaise, to help our readers over the Rugged Roads of Life.
London: Printed for G. Lister, No. 46, Old Bailey. and sold by the booksellers of Oxford, Cambridge, Bath, York, and all other booksellers and news-carriers in Town and Country.
This particular magazine does not appear to have survived even a full year, but there were many others like it.
- A woman of poor reputation, given to sexual promiscuity. ↩
- Crim-con is the abbreviation for ‘Criminal Conversation’. Wives were considered to be their husband’s property. If another man enjoyed their favours, this was seen by the law as a kind of trespass and the husband could sue the other man for damages. ↩
- It‘s easy to see the literal implication of this word; far harder to see how it could be claimed or – still more weird – proved at trial! I suspect this is the advertiser using a fancy term to mean “denial of conjugal rights” by a wife. ↩